@yoasif @kevinrns @Pineywoozle
Perhaps we misunderstand each other.
Our post was simply to share, *with end users,* that a FF based browser --with better default user security protections-- is available now.
As you are the former moderator of r/firefox, surely you know the following:
1. Google supports FF as a fig leaf against FTC antitrust claims. The current FTC sees through that ruse. Google may pull financial support of Mozilla as a result.
2. Mozilla, fearful of going dark from losing the Google money, has started changing Firefox in ways that, in the long run, could turn FF into nothing more than Chrome with a different rendering engine.
Gecko, Blink, and WebKit --the 3 largest actively maintained rendering engines-- are all open source licensed. Even if Mozilla loses its Google blood money and disappears, other organizations with an interest in continuing Gecko could (we think *would*) step in: the Linux Foundation, Apache, KDE, Framasoft, RedHat, SUSE, to name a few
@strangeculprits @kevinrns @Pineywoozle I'm pretty doubtful of your third point -- the support given to Gecko *today* is minuscule - why would organizations attempt to replace Google's revenue entirely, rather than contributing to Chromium or WebKit on the margins?
What is more likely -- that developers will gravitate towards forking or contributing to a fully funded codebase with paid developers, or one that has no upstream and will quickly experience user flight?