Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Ken Shirriff

This photo shows the D-37C computer with advanced 10-layer circuit boards covered with Texas Instruments flat-pack integrated circuits. It used 22 custom integrated circuits; a flip-flop chip cost over $500 in current dollars. 11/N

41 comments
Ken Shirriff replied to Ken

Minuteman III used the upgraded D-37D computer with 14,137 words of storage. It used flexible PCBs, advanced for the time, soldered with low-melting-point indium/tin solder. 12/N

Ken Shirriff replied to Ken

A nearby nuclear blast could cause transient errors in the computer. To prevent this, a "transient current detector" (photo) sensed a radiation pulse and the computer was shut down until the pulse went away. The computer would then continue where it left off, extrapolating the trajectory for the time it was shut down. 13/N

Simon Zerafa :donor: :verified: replied to Ken

@kenshirriff

The Missile knows where it is because it knows where it was ... 😉

Ken Shirriff replied to Ken

The guidance system also contains a stack of amplifier boards, interfacing the computer to the rest of the missile. The amplifier includes high-current drivers for the various pyrotechnics on the missile such as igniting the rocket stages and retrorockets. 14/N

Ken Shirriff replied to Ken

Another block of electronics is the Missile Guidance Set Control, which has amplifiers, power supplies, and servo circuits for the gyroscopes and accelerometers. It has a modular construction with a removable module for each function. 15/N

Ken Shirriff replied to Ken

The missile is powered by an unusual battery. This silver/zinc holds the electrolyte in a separate tank so it has almost infinite shelf life. At launch, a gas generator is ignited, forcing the KOH electrolyte into the battery cells, powering up the battery. 16/N

Ken Shirriff replied to Ken

Another pyrotechnic component is the squib-activated switch, a switch that is activated by a tiny explosive squib. The missile is connected to ground equipment by an umbilical cable, which is disconnected at launch. The explosive switch severs critical signals just before, presumably to avoid any electrical noise when the umbilical is disconnected. Also note the window in the side of the missile for the alignment light beam. 17/N

Ken Shirriff replied to Ken

The guidance system runs 24 hours a day so the missile is ready for immediate launch. On the ground, the system is water cooled; ground support equipment provides a chilled sodium chromate solution through the umbilical connection. This photo shows the coolant path through the computer and other components. 18/N

Ken Shirriff replied to Ken

The missile is programmed with launch codes through the Permutation Plug, a plug that holds the 48-bit code. With great ritual, an armed officer plugged it into the socket below. The launch code also depended on values on disk, so each Launch Control Center had a unique code for each missile. 19/N

Ken Shirriff replied to Ken

A launch normally requires launch orders from two separate Launch Control Centers. But a single surviving Launch Control Center could launch the missiles, unless vetoed before a timeout. A complicated state machine managed the launch process. 20/N

Ken Shirriff replied to Ken

Although the Minuteman guidance system is interesting technologically, one has to keep in mind its purpose was to unleash nuclear devastation On the other hand, Minuteman has been successful as a peacekeeping deterrent (so far). In any case, it is morally ambiguous compared to, say, the Apollo Guidance Computer. There are currently 400 Minuteman missiles active, down from a peak of 1000. 21/N

Ken Shirriff replied to Ken

I wrote a blog post that goes into much more detail on the Minuteman guidance system and computer, so check it out: righto.com/2024/08/minuteman-g
22/23

Ken Shirriff replied to Ken

Credits: many of the photos from National Air and Space Museum: airandspace.si.edu/collection- Minuteman I computer photo by Steve Jurvetson, CC BY 2.0: commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fil D-37C image courtesy Martin Miller: www.martin-miller.us. Diagrams from Minuteman Weapon System: minutemanmissile.com/documents Circuit board photo from bitsavers: bitsavers.org/pdf/autonetics/d Disk head assembly from LaserSam, CC BY-SA 40: commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fil Silo photo by Kelly Michals, CC BY-NC 2.0: flickr.com/photos/rocbolt/7372
23/23

Credits: many of the photos from National Air and Space Museum: airandspace.si.edu/collection- Minuteman I computer photo by Steve Jurvetson, CC BY 2.0: commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fil D-37C image courtesy Martin Miller: www.martin-miller.us. Diagrams from Minuteman Weapon System: minutemanmissile.com/documents

Giles Goat replied to Ken

@kenshirriff Two "super stupid questions" .. actually one maybe a bit less stupid .. 1st question "Of course all that ( very expensive ) tech gets destroyed once the missile is launched ? I suppose when doing tests with no explosive they managed to recover it ? 2nd maybe less stupid have they ever had a "self destruct" thing to avoid such tech to accidentally end up in enemy hands if a missile launched failed to explode and could be recovered ? Maybe I am "too tinfoil hat territory" ? 😅

Ken Shirriff replied to Giles

@gilesgoat Since the missile (and warhead) are crashing down at Mach 23 from hundreds of miles up, I don't think there would be anything left to recover.
For missile tests, they presumably have a self-destruct mechanism (same as rocket launches) so the Range Safety Officer can blow up the missile for safety if it goes off course.

Giles Goat replied to Ken

@kenshirriff Thought so, it breaks my heart to think all that fantastic tech destroyed in an instant .. 😱

illythekid replied to Ken

@kenshirriff Thanks for the interesting read!

the tower fairy replied to Ken

@kenshirriff came for the electronics, stayed for the typefaces :D so 60s

Dan đŸŒ» replied to Ken

@kenshirriff The technology is fascinating, and you've explained it very well, but promoting/sharing weapons of war doesn't feel good to me 😅

Chip Mason replied to Ken
Ben Brockert replied to Ken

@kenshirriff This is a fantastic writeup, basically all of the ~1% of curious people in the space industry will end up reading it. As is often the case, the asides are many of my favorite parts; it feels very American to be specifically concerned about the environmental impact of your Global Thermonuclear War Machine’s cold gas thruster fuel.

On footnote 8 there is a typo, “3000 km, even times the altitude”.

Jorge Peinado replied to Ken

@kenshirriff Absolutely fantastic post. Pure science and technology ( although much better to never see it in action :blobsweats: ). Many thanks for your fantastic posts !!!!

John Francis replied to Ken

@kenshirriff also...zero unintended or unauthorized launches (AFAIK)

Ken Shirriff replied to John

@johnefrancis Well, there were at least two incidents where the warhead was accidentally launched off the missile. Best known is the Damascus incident where a worker dropped a socket, causing a Titan missile to eventually explode, flinging the warhead hundreds of feet. There was also an incident where a worker was debugging the Minuteman silo security system. He pulled a fuse, bizarrely causing a retrorocket in the missile to ignite, flinging the warhead off the missile and it dropped 75 feet to the bottom of the silo.

@johnefrancis Well, there were at least two incidents where the warhead was accidentally launched off the missile. Best known is the Damascus incident where a worker dropped a socket, causing a Titan missile to eventually explode, flinging the warhead hundreds of feet. There was also an incident where a worker was debugging the Minuteman silo security system. He pulled a fuse, bizarrely causing a retrorocket in the missile to ignite, flinging the warhead off the missile and it dropped 75 feet to...

tyx replied to Ken

@kenshirriff @johnefrancis
Always think of these guys when I nearly miss a serious screw-up.

Stewart Russell replied to Ken

@kenshirriff @johnefrancis the 1964 Minuteman incident is written up here: armytimes.com/news/2017/11/04/

As for the Damascus incident, there's Eric Schlosser's whole book, Command & Control

Ken Shirriff replied to Stewart

@scruss @johnefrancis I heartily recommend the book Command and Control.

Stewart Russell replied to Ken

@kenshirriff @johnefrancis agreed. The whole thing starts with "You did *what* on top of two tanks of hypergolic fuel?"

I think the moral of both stories is : go back to the damn truck to get the right tool

root42 replied to Ken

@kenshirriff was the guidance ever upgraded or are those 400 Minutemen still running on this vintage technology?

Ken Shirriff replied to root42

@root42
The Minuteman guidance system was upgraded to the NS-50 in the early 2000s. The new system uses a MIL-STD-175A 16-bit processor. The Minuteman missiles are supposed to be replaced soon by the Sentinel, which is way over budget and delayed, so it's unclear when that will happen.

[DATA EXPUNGED]
Ken Shirriff replied to DELETED

@Eupeptic I think the bar unscrewed and then served to hold the plug in place.

Delta Wye replied to Ken

@kenshirriff That thing about separating the rocket from the ground connection - in a lot of early NASA rocket launches there were incidents (explosions) due to the wield way the launch control/abort circuitry was set up, “sneak circuits” would occur when the rocket was taking off, like just as the rocket disconnected from the grounding plug at the bottom.

I’m wondering if that instant severing of connections with the squib might’ve also been to prevent sneak circuits.

Ken Shirriff replied to Delta

@DeltaWye That makes sense. Weird things could happen right at launch.

Delta Wye replied to Ken

@kenshirriff Document with a great example of a sneak circuit involving the cargo door and landing gear in an aircraft. There are some other examples out there.

If the emergency door open switch and the normal door open switch were operated, the landing gear would deploy.

(Not a sneak circuit but there was an incredible wiring error in a train and a design flaw where sounding a whistle on a locomotive caused the carriages to decouple.)

apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA21

Benjohn replied to Ken

@kenshirriff @DeltaWye I'm wondering if this still makes sense with modern computers clocking away at GigHz – would pyrotechnic be "fast enough"?

Ken Shirriff replied to Benjohn

@benjohn @DeltaWye In the current Minuteman guidance computer (NS-50) they apparently do the disconnect electronically with AND gates rather than explosives.

Tom - KB9ENS replied to Ken

@kenshirriff Standard quartz oscillator or something more exotic?

Ken Shirriff replied to Tom - KB9ENS

@kb9ens I don't know the internals of the power supply oscillators. It could be a quartz oscillator, but I wouldn't be surprised if it were just R-C, since the timing isn't particularly important.
As for the computer, it is synchronized to the disk, so its clock comes from a timing track on the disk rather than a quartz oscillator.

Tom - KB9ENS replied to Ken

@kenshirriff Woah... sounds like that would also be resilient to transient currents and restoration of time after a transient induced shutdown. As ever clever clever...

mxk replied to Ken

@kenshirriff @kb9ens that is an interesting combination of design decisions.
The early transistor computer I am most familiar with (Zuse z23) also used bit serial logic, fixed disk (technically a drum) heads and generated its clock signal directly from the rotations of the disk.
It had a core memory register bank though and came quite a few years earlier.

Go Up