@davew I think I prefer a fact check after the interview instead of journalists deciding what is a lie and who may speak.
Top-level
9 comments
@Kipppunkt @davew @Kipppunkt @davew @kolya @Kipppunkt @davew I think people who believe in certain „big lies“ aren‘t stupid, but tricked and emotionally abused. And I don‘t think such violent behaviour by certain liars can be tolerated, that it goes far beyond being „unwelcome“. What I‘d like to see is interviewers who just keep persisting on such a lie after first occurence, visibly no longer taking the person serious. Who laughingly and forcefully persist until someone cries, time runs out or the guest just leaves. @kmetz @Kipppunkt @davew @kolya @Kipppunkt @davew a lie can travel around the world while the truth is still putting on its shoes |
@kolya @davew
A fact check is a nice thing. But i think a journalist has to intervene imediately and clearify as good as possible. Else the interviewed person had the possibility to use lies for a bigger picture.