@WeirdAlex03@marie@arichtman@Sqaaakoi
Yeah, really good news. There are lots of discussions of what to use as internal TLD, with a bunch of people suggesting not to. Different documents suggested different subsets. The best alternative was home.arpa., but it is a second-level domain. I've seen people here on fedi to use lan. as it is shorter and is suggested in RFC6762 by IETF. But ICANN still can (theoretically) steal it from us. Same RFC mentioned intranet., private., home., corp. and internal., and we finally have one of them confirmed to never be on sale. Yay)
@WeirdAlex03@marie@arichtman@Sqaaakoi
Yeah, really good news. There are lots of discussions of what to use as internal TLD, with a bunch of people suggesting not to. Different documents suggested different subsets. The best alternative was home.arpa., but it is a second-level domain. I've seen people here on fedi to use lan. as it is shorter and is suggested in RFC6762 by IETF. But ICANN still can (theoretically) steal it from us. Same RFC mentioned intranet., private., home., corp. and internal.
Gregory's Server
@marie @arichtman @Sqaaakoi *one Wikipedia article later* and ah-ha! Thank you, I've officially learned about something new today