Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
wakest's posts Post Back to profile
wakest ⁂

This is a milestone worth celebrating! :fediverse:
In development as we speak, @forgejo can now federate comments (and tons of other stuff) from issues in repos!!!

The first screenshot is @algernon (a Forgejo account able to be tagged in this post!) commenting on the issue: shoes.forgejo.madhouse-project as seen in @phanpy while logged into my Mastodon account!
#fediverse #ActivityPub #FediDev #federation #forgejo #git #GitFederation
4 August at 20:17 | Open on social.wake.st
7 comments
Andrew

@liaizon @forgejo @algernon @phanpy huh, I wonder if this will be merged back upstream to gitea

4 August at 20:20 | Open on hackers.town
:female_presenting_nipple:

@liaizon It's not just comments! Pretty much all public user activity federates. Creating a repo? Yup. Tagging? Yup. Branching? Yes. Cutting a release? Sure! Opening an issue? Aye. A PR? Of course. Merging a PR? Mhm. Closing an issue? Yep. And so on...

Do note: this is like the user RSS feeds, except over AP. While federated activities can be replied to, and can be viewed on the Forgejo UI, they are completely detached, and live in their own little world.

(Eventually, I want to make it possible to log into a Forgejo account from any Fedi client. But we're not there yet.)

@liaizon It's not just comments! Pretty much all public user activity federates. Creating a repo? Yup. Tagging? Yup. Branching? Yes. Cutting a release? Sure! Opening an issue? Aye. A PR? Of course. Merging a PR? Mhm. Closing an issue? Yep. And so on...

Do note: this is like the user RSS feeds, except over AP. While federated activities can be replied to, and can be viewed on the Forgejo UI, they are completely detached, and live in their own little world.

4 August at 20:23 | Open on trunk.mad-scientist.club
silverpill

@algernon Can Forgejo actors be followed? I tried to Follow @algernon, the server responded with 500 (I don't know what the response body was but can get it if needed)

@liaizon

4 August at 20:34 | Open on mitra.social
wakest ⁂
:female_presenting_nipple:

@silverpill It's.. complicated. For various reasons, Forgejo needs to explicitly allow various remote server software to interact with it. That list currently includes forgejo, gitea (for historical reasons), mastodon, and gotosocial.

Forgejo should reply with something nicer than an 500, though - I'll look into that!

Eventually, I want to remove this server software limitation (it's legacy code; I understand why it was done so, but I think it's the wrong approach), but that will take a little longer.

@silverpill It's.. complicated. For various reasons, Forgejo needs to explicitly allow various remote server software to interact with it. That list currently includes forgejo, gitea (for historical reasons), mastodon, and gotosocial.

Forgejo should reply with something nicer than an 500, though - I'll look into that!

4 August at 21:52 | Open on trunk.mad-scientist.club
julian

Re: This is a milestone worth celebrating! :fediverse: In development as we speak, a @forgejo can now federate comments from issues in repos!!!

@liaizon@social.wake.st that's fantastic news! Good job @algernon@trunk.mad-scientist.club !

4 August at 20:58 | Open on community.nodebb.org
tux0r :openbsd:

@liaizon I wish it would support other VCSs

5 August at 16:54 | Open on layer8.space
Go Up