|
Top-level
@baldur What's most impressive to me is that they actually try to spin some kind of AI-positive message: > AI, and frankly people, can deliver success measures that go beyond quantity and speed. [...] By aligning co-created outcomes to AI programs, leaders can clarify the AI productivity expectations and goals of the business, better balancing the needs of both the business and workforce. I'll be damned if I know what that last sentence means, but AI = good was clearly the directive here. 7 comments
@bornach Yeah, I would expect they gave up by the end and just asked ChatGPT to spit out some corporate-speak  This sentence isn't doing them any favors either: "By introducing new technology into outdated models and systems, organizations are failing to unlock the full productivity value of generative AI across their workforce." Because "failing to unlock the full productivity value" is quite the whistle.  @albertcardona @baldur @AndrewRadev   @AndrewRadev @baldur > By aligning co-created outcomes to AI programs, leaders can clarify the AI productivity expectations and goals of the business, better balancing the needs of both the business and workforce Ok, I'm pretty sure my next goofy software miniproject is a version of *Mad Libs* that uses this exact bit of corporate glurge as a grammatical template, and replaces "AI" for business emails at a tiny fraction of the cost. |
Gregory's Server
@AndrewRadev Oh, yeah. They clearly had a really hard time figuring out a way to spin this into a positive for AI but ended up with just plain nonsense.