Gregory's Server@stefano reminds me of a (real) security policy in IBM back when I worked there. IIRC it was that due to ssh v1 being insecure you must use ssh v2, or alternatively telnet as that was not vulnerable ...
|
2 comments
 @stefano yes, exactly that. There's no vulnerabilities to patch in telnet.. (as there's no security in it to be vulnerable) |
@sldrant I can't exclude they would accept telnet as not market as *vulnerable* by their excel file