it's not even a bad way to solve this problem. it's ... fine, technically speaking. it is just deeply upsetting
Top-level
it's not even a bad way to solve this problem. it's ... fine, technically speaking. it is just deeply upsetting 5 comments
@whitequark legitimately my reaction to this post is that I saw it and thought "oh good, I can get rid of my own pipx-in-pipx implementation, since that one has no tests and is written in portable shell rather than python" @glyph i genuinely like that pdm depends on a package called `unearth` that installs other packages "unearth" is exactly what you do with a cursed abomination @whitequark okay now I'm looking at the implementation and my manic laughter is slowly transitioning into a keening scream @whitequark Interestingly, you can't install pipx modules inside a venv normally https://github.com/pypa/pipx/issues/904 |
@whitequark it's so good. just embrace the madness