Gregory's Server
In all the hoopla about #AI you’d sort of think people would be debating strong vs weak AI vs the limits of “thinking” by any kind of machine as it has been debated for centuries. Like the Chinese Room thought experiment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_room
But I see nothing of that. Why is that? Do we simply now assume these issues have been resolved in favor of unlimited machine intelligence and all the doubters have been convinced?
@J12t seems like the current crop are very much "weak AI", and demonstrating very clearly how far from "strong AI" we are. I think what's giving many of us pause is how clearly people esteemed by society and educated at prestigious universities are demonstrating that they're not any better at thinking than weak AI