|
Top-level
 @timepencil Anyway, I don't think you need to be condescending about it. Toxicity is not what we need if we want people using privacy software (and thus effectively voting for privacy). 3 comments
@timepencil @dieTasse Hi there, for those seeking a completely separate password detached from existing proton credentials, please vote here: https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/953584/suggestions/48633443 @protonprivacy Don't forget, Proton, to add in the other 2000+ votes for the original "Separate Password for Proton Pass" feature request made on UserVoice. You marked that requested feature as 'completed' despite it not actually being developed at all. It's true that the original feature request's wording was a little nebulous, but the user comments and votes were clearly for a SEPARATE password for accessing Proton Pass. I love your work, Proton, and you CAN do better. We know you will! |
Gregory's Server
@dieTasse @protonprivacy
I do agree that condescension is unnecessary. However, I'm not sure that my post was condescending. But who am I to judge?
ProtonMail has long had a "two password" option for its Mail accounts.
On UserVoice, the feedback hub for Proton, I've been unable to locate any user request for Pass to have TWO passwords (beyond the usual MFAs.)
But there's been HUGE feedback asking for Pass to have a SEPARATE password from that used to access the entire suite of products.
@dieTasse @protonprivacy
I do agree that condescension is unnecessary. However, I'm not sure that my post was condescending. But who am I to judge?
ProtonMail has long had a "two password" option for its Mail accounts.
On UserVoice, the feedback hub for Proton, I've been unable to locate any user request for Pass to have TWO passwords (beyond the usual MFAs.)