Top-level
13 comments
@orbitalmartian @rolltime And there are vast amounts of middle ground between good old html and bloated sites as they exist today. More likely, they have a high enough SLA with their CDNs that they just build in the expectation that they'll have outages for a little while per year. @orbitalmartian @f4grx @rolltime it's cheaper not to host it yourself if you are a huge corporation @Kurt @orbitalmartian @rolltime and if the website was much, much simpler than the marketing team requires? And that does not mean ugly. @f4grx @orbitalmartian @rolltime but the marketing team,,, do you know how many jobs that could cost? :neocat_googly_shocked: @orbitalmartian @f4grx @rolltime not that kind of infrastructure. CDNs usually have a PoP in each region, with some good connections to local ISPs. Netflix can do even better and embed their storage at ISPs directly, but "large corporations" on average don't deal with that level of deployment. @orbitalmartian @f4grx @rolltime I think big business needs big buzzwords, so you can't have a website that doesn't use all the latest and greatest JavaScript frameworks, databases and stuff. If you don't have more microservices than users, then you're not doing real work there :D |
@orbitalmartian @rolltime It also amazes me. yes, of course more distribution of data is better. thats the way it should be.