Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
9 comments
Hugh

@mike "As we have clearly demonstrated in the last decade, there is no detrimental effect to changing Prime Minister every year or two, so we suggest that Poseidon should be appeased annually." 😂

dch :flantifa: :flan_hacker:

@mike for my edification, is it *necessary* for the politician(s) to come back out of the sea? Keeping them there seems like a win-win for everybody.

:female_presenting_nipple:

@dch @mike They do cause a noticable amount of pollution, so keeping them there has environmental consequences. Although, to be fair, the impact is probably much smaller than if they're let back out.

Mike, First of His Name

@algernon @dch I should add something about this to the FAQ, thanks.

There is no precedent for a PM coming out of the sea. While I believe they should not come out again, this is definitely a matter that should be left up to Poseidon.

dch :flantifa: :flan_hacker:

@mike @algernon please add a section to the FAQ indicating that contributions to Poseidon from other countries are welcomed, but it may be necessary to contribute in greater quantities to ensure a successful outcome.

Ertain

@mike Does the prime minister have to go willingly? Could people throw him into the sea?

Mike, First of His Name

@Ertain I think their willingness to go into the sea as Poseidon desires is an essential question that needs to be asked of all candidates for political office. It should be a requirement of the role.

Saket

@mike @aral This is sheer genius! Although I’m not Australian, as a resident of a sea-faring nation I think we should almost certainly try getting our prime minister to get into the sea!

Go Up