Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Delta Chat

Third time is a charm!

Watch us tirelessly explaining to Roskomnadzor how e-mail works! The three innovations in our third reply are that we

a) request the international law their request is grounded on (as if they would care)

b) communicate that their assumptions, even according to russian laws, are wrong (as if they would care)

c) state explicitly that Delta Chat is unlike WhatsApp, Signal or Telegram (doh!)

#chatcontrol-delenda-est

A letter from merlinux to Roskomandzor:
Regarding registration of Delta Chat provided services in Russia
with the following key content: 

1) You fail to reference relevant International Law that would give you the authority to request
any interaction from us as an organization residing within the legal framework of the European
Union. If you don’t reference any international law or treaty, you are required to direct your
queries to the german foreign ministry instead, which in turn would get in contact with us.
2) Even if your request was grounded in international law, merlinux is not an „ICO“ or
„Information Communication Organizer“ as defined in Section 10.1 of 149-FZ. In particular, we
maintain that this base assumption stated in your letter is not correct:
„According to the results of the analysis the information resource delta.chat
<https://delta.chat/> , the owner of which is a foreign organization merlinux GmbH, was found
to have the capability to receive, transmit, deliver and (or) process electronic messages of
Internet users.“
Unlike Telegram or Whatsapp, the information resource „delta.chat“ does not have the ability
to receive, transmit, deliver or process electronic messages. All users of our e-mail client apps
choose electronic message processors („e-mail servers“) sovereignly themselves, without our
knowledge and without sending their messages through a central server like it happens with
Telegram or Whatsapp.
18 comments
Zsolt

@delta not the sharpest in the toolbox at Orcskomnadzor.

dexternemrod

@delta
Their mailadress looks like a phishing-attempt 🐟

Jan Penfrat

@delta Thanks for sharing these, this is gold for the public debate.

romikk

@delta why bother? I would send all their messages to the spam bin. What's the worst that can happen?

WofWca

@romikk It is right. Otherwise Roskomnadzor could claim "Delta Chat didn't respond, so we blocked them", and it wouldn't look as bad on them as "Delta Chat refused to start collecting user data for us, so we blocked them" would.

romikk

@WofWca well, in this case one response to them outlining your position is enough. No need to prove anything pointing to the laws they don't care about.

WofWca

@romikk They don't care, but we do. It's not about just Delta Chat and Roskomnadzor, it's about how the public sees all this. "Delta Chat is right and Roskomnadzor are wrong", that's what we want to see, and not just assume.

rohden
@delta


#chatcontrol
How do WA, Signal … react to such requests?
Dominik

@delta Funny enough this also happened the other way round to the russian developers of the XABBER Android Jabber/XMPP client receiving a letter from the German @BNetzA due to a similar failure to understand how that app worked:

cmshs-bloggt.de/tmc/telekommun

photo of letter from Bundesnetzagentur
photo of letter from Bundesnetzagentur
Delta Chat

@asdil12 @BNetzA very interesting even if it's a bit old. The base considerations from this interesting article should still apply. Do you know how the Russian developers responded to this?

Delta Chat

@asdil12 @BNetzA thanks, thread apparently cannot be accessed without login but we'll figure it out. (Not really using Twitter for a year or two now)

Go Up