@raphaelmorgan @levampyre @samir
I didn’t, no.
I was simply wondering how levampyre could come to the conclusion that of the non-pointless software out there, is mostly made by scientists and the like. And not generic non-scientist developers.
I did not think the suggestion was that most scientists make non-pointless software.
Whilst I understand you were trying to be helpful, it’s really uncomfortable to be told by someone else what I was thinking and have it framed in this way.
Perhaps it was my wording that I fucked up, but I’d appreciate requests to explain rather than being told I did wrong.
@james Oh, scientists amongst others, because people, who are neither developers, nor scientists in some way, have a personal need to write a lot of software. It's an assumption, true. Convince me otherwise. I'm open to learning.
@raphaelmorgan @samir