Linux community losing their minds over a single badly named command in systemd.
And you know what? Imagine if something like that would be made not by systemd but by GNU? They would also keep stupid legacy with bad UX, refuse to change it and probably be dicks about it. And I imagine most linux users would be completely fine about it and even argue it's logical and better in some way.
Yes, it's an issue, and possible indicative of larger issues with developments of systemd, but it's not the actual main reason behind the outrage, it's an excuse for it.
And you know what? Imagine if something like that would be made not by systemd but by GNU? They would also keep stupid legacy with bad UX, refuse to change it and probably be dicks about it. And I imagine most linux users would be completely fine about it and even argue it's logical and better in some way.
Yes, it's an issue, and possible indicative of larger issues with developments of systemd, but it's not the actual main reason behind the outrage, it's an excuse for it.
@untsuki what do you mean by "if"