@ludicity Very enjoyable read, thank you.
I wish there was some mention of the energy costs / climate impact of the tech tho, which TBH is what worries me the most.
Top-level
@ludicity Very enjoyable read, thank you. I wish there was some mention of the energy costs / climate impact of the tech tho, which TBH is what worries me the most. 9 comments
@xarvh @rhempel True, though I should point out the LLM revolution is slightly unique. They don't need engineering discipline - you just make an OpenAI request. If they move on to something else, it might suck, but it is actually harder to damage the environment through something like a data governance hypefest (unless it's GPU or blockchain powered). These are idle thoughts though, it could still go terribly and I haven't thought on what's next deeply. @rhempel@0mstdn.ca @xarvh @ludicity > Then the question becomes what to do with all the large, lightless, but well cooled empty buildings. Not the actual point of the original post or your comment, I realize, but my first thought was that if you can add effective air ventilation and filtration (as well as lighting, presumably), these may repurpose as public cooling centers in extreme heat events, which we will have increasing call for from climate change. @ShaulaEvans @rhempel @xarvh @ludicity half of them into non-AI datacentres, and half of them into house or hostel space |
@xarvh @ludicity Your point is valid, but long before the energy problem shuts down GenAI data centers, the lack of paying customers will pull the trigger.
Then the question becomes what to do with all the large, lightless, but well cooled empty buildings.