@Blort Chromium is licensed under the 3-clause BSD...

@Blort Chromium is licensed under the 3-clause BSD license and is not controlled by Google. Anyone can fork it, as with any *other* FOSS project.

That said, I'm happy to see Servo's test pass rate climbing closer to 100%!

Like 3 June at 5:13 | Wall-to-wall | Open on linuxrocks.online

3 comments

Blort™ 🐀Ⓥ🥋☣️

@codrusofathens

Control is wielded by more than a license.

To quote Chromium's Wikipedia page:
"in terms of governance, the Chromium projects are not independent entities; Google retains firm control of them."

...and that's only governance which is still just one of many avenues along with funding, development, marketing etc.

3 June at 5:26 | Open on social.tchncs.de

Codrus :archlinux: 🇺🇲

@Blort
Google can absolutely choose which direction to take *Chrome,* but remember that Brave, for instance, is not following them on dropping Manifest v2 support or limiting adblocking.

Also, Microsoft and other companies¹ extensively contribute to Chromium as well, and they're won't agree to anything that gives Google more control. (1/2)

[1] Even Akamai, the FOSS-friendly cloud provider. See here: https://opensource.googleblog.com/2016/12/why-i-contribute-to-chromium.html

@Blort
Google can absolutely choose which direction to take *Chrome,* but remember that Brave, for instance, is not following them on dropping Manifest v2 support or limiting adblocking.

Also, Microsoft and other companies¹ extensively contribute to Chromium as well, and they're won't agree to anything that gives Google more control. (1/2)

Expand text...

3 June at 13:38 | Open on linuxrocks.online

Codrus :archlinux: 🇺🇲

@Blort
I want to see Servo take off, especially because it's written in Rust, and promises better security than current C++ monstrosities. But to say that Chromium is a Google-only project, or to somehow imply it isn't just as free and open-source as Gecko/Firefox or Servo is disingenuous. (2/2)

3 June at 13:42 | Open on linuxrocks.online