@J12t It’s so comically bad. I think the term “Rube Goldberg” applies: I can admire the extreme feats of engineering derring-do while mostly just being bemused by the outcome.
Top-level
4 comments
@J12t Yeah. It’s the same motivated reasoning I often encounter when reading about Web3 investments. It’s sorta ironic that they mention SMTP but neglect to note that it’s a blockchain-free open protocol that successfully forms a decentralized social network of, like, literally everyone on the Internet. @davepeck it’s almost like the investor mind needs to hear a new technology ingredient— eg blockchain — in order to be able to believe that this decentralization thing is now possible. To answer the question of: why didn’t this happen before and why can it happen now? Blockchain! I wonder whether we can come up with a secret new ingredient sauce that’s not blockchain but that can play the same role. “It has always been possible” is not quite as credible… |
@davepeck USV wrote about what makes them excited about Farcaster. I note the reasoning applies almost identically to the ActivityPub Fediverse -- the benefits of open, decentralized protocols, a large ecosystem of developers etc. Except for the economic dimension: would be nice to have the integrated ability to send money, I agree. On the other hand, we here don't require messages to be public, which is required for a lot of use cases IMHO.
https://blog.usv.com/farcaster