Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
BigFoxBoss

@drq @mittorn @mo
Again, you expect people to always be rational and go reference?

I also told you if basic FAQ doesn't alleviate support centers from silly questions and squabble, then this feature is unlikely to prevent further dramas.
That feature might actually exacerbate them, by referencing a previous heated discusson and people wiill get even more riled up reading them.

6 comments
Dr. Quadragon ❌ replied to BigFoxBoss

@BigFoxBoss Well, if someone is being irrational to the point of being annoying, that's what's moderation for.

@mittorn @mo

BigFoxBoss replied to Dr. Quadragon ❌

@drq @mittorn @mo
So, if someone annoys you just because they ask something someone else asked n-th time before them, or if they express what they think many times (and by extension annoy you by it), you'd ban them?

Dr. Quadragon ❌ replied to BigFoxBoss

@BigFoxBoss I would ban anybody being sufficiently annoying and abusive, no matter how they do it.

@mittorn @mo

BigFoxBoss replied to Dr. Quadragon ❌

@drq @mittorn @mo
Even if it's as innocent as you ending up having to reiterate something mentioned and/or discussed before?

"This user made me reiterate, 'cuz they "didn;'t read the platinum thread"/"asked me many times making me repeat", therefore they are annoying to me -> ban!"

Since when ending up reiterating a point is considered abuse? :ablobfoxhyperowo:

Dr. Quadragon ❌ replied to BigFoxBoss

@BigFoxBoss Uhhh... You are not making sense and are putting words in my mouth at this point.

@mittorn @mo

BigFoxBoss replied to Dr. Quadragon ❌

@drq @mittorn @mo
Neither does bringing in moderation here make any sense.

How can you expect to moderate what people ever discussed or doing to discuss, just to avoid repeating oneself and/or "avoid drama"?

Go Up