@charlag@Gargron you are right in pointing something here: people with huge IDEs (think IntelliJ) Vs people with plain editors would design languages differently
@movonw@Gargron the thing is, Intellij-based editors excel when the structure is unambiguous: like in Java or JS with ES modules (both are more-or-less). I more often than not see Ruby devs using plain editors, I guess IDE just not add so much benefit with very dynamic languages.
Is there LSP server for Ruby already?
Gregory's Server
@movonw @Gargron the thing is, Intellij-based editors excel when the structure is unambiguous: like in Java or JS with ES modules (both are more-or-less). I more often than not see Ruby devs using plain editors, I guess IDE just not add so much benefit with very dynamic languages.
Is there LSP server for Ruby already?