Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Joe Heafner

@gerrymcgovern @msbellows Why is this legal? I would’ve told Google to kiss it and pound sand.

2 comments
M.S. Bellows, Jr.

@heafnerj @gerrymcgovern Oregon Revised Statute 192.345 Public records conditionally exempt from disclosure: "The following public records are exempt from disclosure under ORS 192.311 to 192.478 unless the public interest requires disclosure in the particular instance: ... (2) Trade secrets. 'Trade secrets,' as used in this section, may include, but are not limited to, any formula, plan, pattern, process, tool, mechanism, compound, procedure, production data, or compilation of information which is not patented, which is known only to certain individuals within an organization and which is used in a business it conducts, having actual or potential commercial value, and which gives its user an opportunity to obtain a business advantage over competitors who do not know or use it."

@heafnerj @gerrymcgovern Oregon Revised Statute 192.345 Public records conditionally exempt from disclosure: "The following public records are exempt from disclosure under ORS 192.311 to 192.478 unless the public interest requires disclosure in the particular instance: ... (2) Trade secrets. 'Trade secrets,' as used in this section, may include, but are not limited to, any formula, plan, pattern, process, tool, mechanism, compound, procedure, production data, or compilation of information which is...

Joe Heafner

@msbellows @gerrymcgovern In this case it was obviously a threat. I would call the bluff.

Go Up