@bkw777 @tab2space @paul_ipv6 why would we develop and maintain and personally use a feature we don't trust. Use your noggin, we eat our own dogfood.
Top-level
@bkw777 @tab2space @paul_ipv6 why would we develop and maintain and personally use a feature we don't trust. Use your noggin, we eat our own dogfood. 2 comments
Your heat here seems very weird to me. Defensiveness isn't warranted. Chances of problems scale with complexity. A feature with no known bugs still has a chance of bugs being discovered later. If the feature implementation isn't present, however, then those bugs don't affect the release without the feature. I encourage you to embrace the options of being able to use core functionality, while adding access methods tailored for a user's risk appetite. |
@keepassxc @tab2space @paul_ipv6
Your trust of a feature is entirely irrelevant to my point and does not invalidate it.
Presenting a non-sequiter like that as an argument places you in a not-great position from which to try to talk about anyone else's failure to use any noggins.