@tuxwise I took my time to reach the decision it went back and forth for a year, and the xz-utils thing eventually tilted things in favour of shipping as little code builtin as possible by default.
I do not believe however that there is a significant overlap between people who use Debian, keepaasxc, and people looking for a featureful password manager.
It just makes no sense to go with a local only password manager and then put gaping holes in it.
@keepassxc
@juliank @tuxwise @keepassxc I fall into this category, though I would obviously like to think I'm unique. Either way, you mentioned taking the time to make a desicion, and yet the upstream devs seemed to have been caught completely by surprise. That really shouldn't happen for what I hope are obvious reasons. What went wrong here? Did they just ignore all your communications and deliberations about this decision?