|
Top-level
@martin_piper @atatassault @intransitivelie @jlsigman @ben I can't prove a negative, try again. To anyone reading this after the fact: the evidence is that LLMs are notoriously bad for hallucinating attribution. There would need to be some pretty major changes to get attribution to work accurately and reliably, and this doesn't even cover the share-alike licensing issues. 2 comments
 @martin_piper @bananarama @atatassault @intransitivelie @jlsigman @ben The number of commercial LLMs or generative AIs in general that do attribution of their sources as licenced is currently 0. The entire industry have been able to get away with it for now several years. Do you expect stackexchange to be radically different in a positive way and not communicate about it? |
Gregory's Server
@bananarama @atatassault @intransitivelie @jlsigman @ben you're the one claiming there isn't attribution...