Gregory's Server
@ben I recall hearing somewhere that all that content is a super permissive copy left license and it turns out it is! One that requires attribution and transformations to declare what was changed. I'm sure nothing will come of that but if any lawyers out there want to take up the banner, a person could make a strong argument that open AI is incapable of honoring the license. 🤔
|
4 comments
 @firecat it sadly does not, because AI training currently does not count as derivative work. While making a caricature of Mickey Mouse might get you in trouble (except if it’s steamboat willy), creating an almost-but-not-exactly prompt-driven copy-machine is (legally speaking) fair game for anything that was accessible online. @lyonsinbeta @ben This reminded me of OpenAI having a GDPR complaint filed against them, as it will output information about people but those people have no way of asking to have it removed or what the source is. https://noyb.eu/en/chatgpt-provides-false-information-about-people-and-openai-cant-correct-it Presumably the lack of sources would also bite them here. |
@lyonsinbeta @ben AI can’t even tell the truth, so yes it breaks Creative Commons laws and regulations.