Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
John Harris

@suetanvil @jame @dillo Same. I wonder what would be involved in compiling it for Windows?

15 comments
John Harris

@dillo @suetanvil @jame Ah, requiring an X server to run will make it inappropriate in many contexts. Maybe later? If it's a decent alternative Chrome it could get a lot of uptake.

realjame

@dillo @rodneylives @suetanvil yes! i compiled dillo 3.1 on Ubuntu WSL and it works perfectly, it even shows up in my windows start menu and everything

a Dillo GUI window running on Windows 11 next to a WSL terminal and an about windows menu
Stewart Russell

@rodneylives @suetanvil @jame @dillo Building on Windows doesn't look like my idea of fun:

"Dillo can be built for Windows (tested on Windows 11) by using the Cygwin POSIX portability layer and run with Xorg ..." — github.com/dillo-browser/dillo

realjame

@scruss @rodneylives @suetanvil @dillo with WSL i simply follow the linux instructions and everything just works

John Harris

@jame @scruss @suetanvil @dillo I run Linux on a couple of machines though, and aspire to run it on my daily driver eventually.

niu tech

@rodneylives @jame @scruss @suetanvil @dillo I've built #Dillo 3.1.0 on Windows 11 using #Cygwin without problems and it takes only 5MB of RAM on startup, but requires X Window Server.

Dillo 3.1.0 on Windows 11
John Harris

@scruss @suetanvil @jame @dillo Yeah. But the project was just revived, give it some time.

Stewart Russell

@rodneylives @jame it's built on top of FLTK, which might be hard to unpick.

@suetanvil
if you need smol, maybe try NetSurf — netsurf-browser.org/

Chris [list of emoji]

@scruss @rodneylives @jame

It looks like FLTK supports native Win32, so the Dillo issue seems more like a configuration problem on their end. It's likely that someone with sufficient Windows skills can get it to work as a native app.

Go Up