Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Priscilla Haring-Kuipers

@baldur visuals 'draw the eye' and most writers are required to deliver royalty free visuals with any article. I would expect a most fitting use case here where generated visuals replace other non-artistic, soulless visuals
Stock photos to me also indicates a lower class article as really good (well paid) writing is under a serious editorial team that would have some artists/photographers as well

2 comments
Baldur Bjarnason

@priscillaharing Oh, I'm sure that writers are required to deliver visuals. I just think that the "draw the eye" statement for web-based articles is a superstition based on a small number of badly structured studies that were made years ago in a very very different environment, but that's not something the writers can do anything about so not really something that can be constructively debated

And again, generated art is becoming to stock photo what stock photo is to editorial photography.

Baldur Bjarnason

@priscillaharing Ah, sorry about the digression in the previous post. Still drinking my morning coffee.

The point I was trying to get across is that generated art, because of its statistical nature, tends to have a number of shared artifacts that are fairly easy to spot. Which makes them immediately counterproductive in any context where they appear as a preview thumbnail.

Go Up