@claudius @raven667 @thomasfuchs let's face it, user-facing FOSS is usually a subpar copy of commercial software. I use a ton of FOSS on my home lab and elsewhere but that's how it is.
Top-level
@claudius @raven667 @thomasfuchs let's face it, user-facing FOSS is usually a subpar copy of commercial software. I use a ton of FOSS on my home lab and elsewhere but that's how it is. 3 comments
@claudius @raven667 @thomasfuchs I think the strengths of FOSS are in the backend and experimentation. User-facing apps are almost invariably better commercial. @stooovie I think, for the most part open source is now at a weird "good enough" state. I get by very well with LibreOffice, Firefox, KiCad, VSCodium, Kdenlive, digiKam, OBS Studio, Inkscape, Krita, Blender, Joplin and quite a few others. Integration is what really sucks, though. I enjoy using some of them, I tolerate using some of them. Overall I'm pretty happy that I have all of these. I'm glad that I can contribute to them, I like that I can sometimes influence their trajectory slightly. |
@stooovie
As someone who is running Linux on my daily-driver laptop (Ubuntu, Debian, Ubuntu and currently Fedora) for well over a decade, I sadly agree.
With very rare exceptions, FLOSS is playing a constant game of catch up.
Also I don't *nearly* spend as much time on fixing shit on my Windows PC as I do on my Linux laptop.
@raven667 @thomasfuchs