Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Johannes Ernst

I’m genuinely puzzled by Iran’s attack yesterday. In the mind of the Iranians, was this retaliation, with respect to the perceived wrong, supposed to be:

Anonymous poll

Poll

One-tit-for-one-tat (equivalent response)
2
14.3%
More-than-one-tit-for-a-tat (hit them harder)
3
21.4%
Less-than-one-tit-for-tat (de-escalate)
9
64.3%
14 people voted.
Voting ended 17 April at 18:25.
3 comments
Johannes Ernst

The western press says it was supposed to de-escalate. Evidence: telegraphed up front, “concluded” statement before the missiles even hit.
But: largest simultaneous drone/missile attack I have ever heard of. Not even the Russians do things like that in Ukraine I think.
So which one is it?

🍄🌈🎮💻🚲🥓🎃💀🏴🛻🇺🇸

@J12t it's a bit of both I think; they wanted to hit *something* but they knew the defenses were good. So

WikiParty

@J12t Assuming the claims of having shot down most of the drones & missiles are true, then a major depletion of air defences has been achieved. Just when there was already a shortage of such.

Go Up