The Verge article on the best printer in 2024 is just completely brilliant in so many ways.
And also kinda sad.
The Verge article on the best printer in 2024 is just completely brilliant in so many ways. And also kinda sad. 132 comments
@mijndert I have an HP Laserjet mono printer. Has lasted years. Utterly reliable. Maintenance free (other than occasional toner replacements). Definitely the way. @ross @mijndert I have a simple HP LaserJet as well. Apart from the occasional WiFi hiccup, it indeed just works when I need it to. No fuss with 'no printing until you replace all ink cartridges!' or 'I'll go and pop into the nearest HP webshop to order a lot of expensive extra sh** you don't need!' with this one. @ross I can feel the dejection oozing out of just the title, never mind the rest @ross @sarajw @richlv thank you for pointing it out, my dark-reader hid all those links. The story is now thrice as funny. @ross Not only an indictment of the printer industry but of LLMs too. You can tell the author has just had enough. @Jbasoo Nikay is editor in chief. He does seem like a really smart guy who gets nuance and has a real mission. The episode of his own podcast where someone else interviews him is fascinating. "Donโt feel compelled to do it; my only ask is that you make this article go viral by sharing it in faux-outrage that the EIC of The Verge has published an article partially generated by AI" I was just doing what I was told to ๐ @ross They're on point. I bought one of those brother cheapies for less than 100โฌ recently, and it's working great. Apparently they have been churning out my exact model for at least ten years now. It doesn't have wifi, has no cloud integration, doesn't even have a display, but just works without a fuss, and does an adequate job. @jaseg @ross I still have my 15 years old Kyocera FS-1300D. It has 6LED that clearly communicate its status, a chunky real power switch, it has no wifi (to be fair not even LAN, so it dangles on a lan to usb print server), I have forgotten when I last changed toner (that i all bought 15 years ago) and it is just there and prints when i need a print and nothing else. @Zitruskeks @jaseg @ross Can confirm the long-term reliability. However, I couldn't find a new developer unit when I tried replacing it some months ago ๐ Not that the old one is *broken* broken, but the plastic clamp that holds the toner cartridge tight is worn out. @Zitruskeks @jaseg @ross we have a Kyocera Ecosys colour laser printer at home and honestly it just works It does have Ethernet and Wi-Fi, though, which was one of the main reasons I got it โ I wanted a network printer The only thing that did not work was Google Cloud Print; the device went into crash loop if you had that set up @bbbhltz @ross and now that half of those 16 companies have fired their writers and have โpivotedโ to AI generated content with one Human editor for 50 daily โarticlesโโฆ makes it hard to trust SEO sites. at least vox and the verge only depend 45% on SEO since they depend more on actual visits to their sites like RSS reader traffic. @ross I had one of the earlier models of this printer in my woodwork shop to print out orders. Even when absolutely caked in sawdust it still worked perfectly (with a slight burning smell). I use a HP Laserjet at home, but if this one ever dies my next will be a Brother HL. I love that this is a yearly thing now: https://www.theverge.com/23642073/best-printer-2023-brother-laser-wi-fi-its-fine @ross I switched from a BW Brother laser printer 2700DW to a color Brother inkjet printer T720DW two years ago and I don't regret it. @ross I buy and recommend the basic models everywhere and to everyone. Such good printers. OMG that's literally the printer I bought last week. Small. Reliable. Dull. Everything a printer should be. @ross Two requirements for me, color prints and duplex printing. This printer does neither. Single side printing requires more paper or printing alternate pages on two runs. That's not efficient, especially if you don't get page alignment right to keep page order. My HP 450 DN has been a workhorse for 10+ years no. My previous HP color, duplex printer still work but HP dropped driver to use it. @wsrphoto Yeah. I get that if you have use cases for those things. The additional cost is not worth it for me or many people. @ross That printer does duplex printing - I know as I have it. (brother makes several models, the article is about whatever is on sale, I waited until the week the model with duplex as on sale and thus the cheapest option). You can get brother lasers with color as well, but they are never the cheapest thing on sale. For most people though they are better off sending their color printing needs to the nearest store and picking it up on the next errant. @ross @ross @ross I advise looking up online for how's the Linux support before buying a random old Brother like I did @ross I think our Brother HL-2140 might be turning 18 this year. It's seen our household through four degrees and a couple years' WFH. Raspberry Pi as its print server. If it ever dies I guess I'll find a duplex model. @ross I have a larger model with the scanner and feeder tray, DPC L2550DW, because it was the only #Brother #Printer I could find during the 'Rona times. It's a beast. There is a reason that nearly every car mechanic shop has a Brother printer still printing invoices while caked in dust, oil, grease, stacks car parts, and the occasional shop #Cat . @ross Iโve had a Brother laser printer for several years, and I can confirm that itโs an absolute workhorse. When I finally used up the original toner cartridge, I bought 3rd party replacements and they were great (still on the first one actually, they last forever). Thereโs no need to buy Brother cartridges. @ross Got a Brother at home, been using Brother for years. Best printers. They still rip you off on toner though. @ross my experience differs. Iโve had to buy toner for my brother laser printer from time to time. Thatโs because I bought it 9 years ago and it still works, even though I feed it the cheapest toner I can find on eBay or Amazon. Unlike all of the inkjets I bought before it, the printer works fine even if I go months without printing. Toner doesnโt dry out and plug the non-existent toner nozzles if you ignore it for too long. @ross @ross This is the best article I've read in a while, just for the sheer level of done that bleeds through the copy @ross I've been very happy with the Brother laser printer I bought in 2006 when I started graduate school. It's still kicking. Based on that experience, though, I recommended a different Brother printer to someone a few years ago. They had issues with it forcing early toner refills that it definitely didn't need yet. Old models used an optical sensor of some sort to check toner levels, and new ones just count pages and throw tantrums when you refuse to replace toner when it says so. @ross This is 100% true. I bought ours in 2017. The initial free toner pack printed 566 pages, high capacity replacement 1899 pages, still on the next one.Total 3407 pages printed, 963 on the current toner pack. I do regularly consider getting a fancy inkjet for photography purposes, but eh. @ross I sometimes print cyanotypes and the laser creates banding on the transparencies I print the negatives on - mostly I like it, as it exposes the partially digital nature of my process in the final print, but sometimes I would like to avoid it... @ross Just to let you know that even Brother is going to the dark side. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31860131 My view: don't buy a printer unless you're a business or enterprise. @ross have a brother 7820N that's at least 10-12 yrs old. After a house move, it sat unused for literally 8 years. Finally put it back in rotation... Fired up and printed straight away even with the same toner cartridge Holy crap! I need to write me some angst and irony filled articles about printers. This is crazy!! @chris You should absolutely revel in your proximity to my re-broadcasting greatness!!! ๐คด @ross That's what I get when you flush down those beans ๐คฃ I better hold off with my 'snarky' remarks (again) :birthdaymsn: @ross This isn't about you, it is specific to Brother printers and that's why it resonates. Also specifically Brother printers (not HP) because they don't need special drivers. @ross I have a brother laser printer. It's great, and we use it 'a lot'. I bought replacement toner and everything. I bought it 10 years ago, in 2014 for $350 You can still buy it now for $850 but I would get a newer model. I had to repair it in 2018. The 'toner fuser' broke and I bought the replacement part on Amazon for $140 in 2018 and its worked great. I hate HP so much. I'd rather print at fedex office stores then buy an HP printer. Get whatever brother laser printer is on sale. +1 @ross But that article is great on multiple levels. The enshitification of printers by HP and others doomed the home printer to overpriced irrelevance. The only answer is 'Brother printers' because it works with as little long-term cost and bother as possible. And the article outlines exactly what sucks about these types of articles so well, that it makes it an almost joy to read. Sad as it is. A post-content commentary on what passes for journalism and commerce today. I love it, sad to say. @ross All printers are so bad that when a mainstream tech news outlet tells people one printer is best, it sets off a glimmer of hope in them, that they've long been searching for but nobody has ever found, that may be, just may be, there really is a printer out there that isn't going to regularly sap hours off their day whilst trying to fix a "trivial" tech support issue... Alas, such a printer does not exist. @ross I have one like this (slightly different model with an ADF scanner, but basically the same thing) that I got for university a decade plus agoโฆ had to buy new toner maybe once since then? Itโs still printing along like a champ. @ross Sysadmin here that does some printer support. I have a Brother at home and I trust it to work like no other brand or type of printer I've worked on. That is a remarkable achievement and resounding endorsement from this jaded burnt out tech professional. Do yourself a kindness if you print at home and get a brother laser printer ๐จ @Crazypedia @ross Literally looking to my bookshelf, and there it is on the bottom shelf. A grey and black brother laser printer that just works and asks for nothing in return @ross I agree completely with the sentiment, but in my case I bought a Dell multi-function color laser printer 10 years ago and I have only changed toner a couple of times (colors can be changed individually and I buy the cheapest off-brand I can find). I find it sad that people buy HP printers. My SO unfortunately needs to print on very thick paper for which lasers don't work and she's always dealing with printer problems. I've had my Brother laser printer for like 22 years now, and it's still going strong. My only concern is that they'll stop making cartridges for it. @zachvat @ross I have a HL5240DN that I bought in the early 2000s. Still going strong. A year back I could not find the correct cartridge, so I bought a different Brother cartridge, popped the top off each, then poured the toner into the old one and put the top back on. Another several thousand pages before I need to worry again. It's easy as long as you are careful ๐ So even lack of correct cartridges can't kill them. @ross i have one of these i found on the sidewalk 6 or 7 years ago outside a doctors office, (my guess is when the starter toner ran out they thought it was broken) and its been all id ever need and has worked perfectly on several computers and through many OS generations. Kudos to good decent design! A RPi 1 B+ plus an old Brother is my in-home network print server. Simple, effective, cheap, and reliable. @ross That doesn't have a scanner does it? Totally agreed that people love to bash HP. I'm using HP instant ink and it's a fine subscription. You set how many prints you want and pay for it. The ink shows up and the printer seems to work. If I didn't need color or a scanner/copier and wanted to spend more I could move to a laser printer. Some people seem to be really riled by the fact that ink cartridges from the subscription don't work after you stop paying. That's how it works. @ross @CStamp I have a Brother laser printer that I bought several years ago, along with a replacement toner cartridge that I planned to pop in when the โdemoโ cartridge ran out. The demo cartridge warned me the other day that the toner was low, but then I said โhaha, April Fool, right?โ and we both had a chuckle. "Itโs weird because the correct answer to the query โwhat is the best printerโ has not changed, but an entire ecosystem of content farms seems motivated to constantly update articles about printers in response to the incentive structure created by that robotโs obvious preferences. Pointing out that incentive structure and the culture thatโs developed around it seems to make a lot of people mad, which is also interesting!" @ross I have a multifunction Canon I got for ~$60 9 years ago now and it's still great. Ink is expensive-ish, but we don't use it very often and the ink seems to last a decent amount of time even with sporadic printing. Not even thinking of replacing it until it breaks - then I might switch to a Brother printer haha. @ross guess I must have lucked out as my HP doesn't have any of the ludicrous bullshit people complain about. But ultimately, it's a frustrating thing to have. I need this printer like, twice a year, but those are times when I absolutely frikkin need it. However, the inkjet cartridges will absolutely dry up and clog if I don't, say, print a test page every week, which wastes both paper and ink @ross I don't know what is sad about the amazing abundance of everyday luxuries that capitalism gives us. I think it's pretty wonderful actually. @ross I still have an HP V40 #printer that does everything. However, it won't work with Windows 10 or 11 because HP decided it wasn't in their interest for consumers to continue using older, perfectly good machines. I had to keep my Windows 7 laptop so I could print (using a manual memory stick from my Win11 laptop). It's ridiculous. This is how HP lost its way. @ross I totally agree, from years mi home printer is a Monocrome Laser Brother, hundreds of pages printed for a laugh prize with compatible supplies... I would be mad for paying again for unicorn blood (colour ink) @ross 6 or 7 year ago, I purchased a used Brother laser printer (some model from 2004) from my old employer for 5โฌ. It still prints and the cartridge I got it with still works. It also doesn't need any driver installation on Linux or Windows. Shit just works. Sometimes I have to kick the paper feeder for it to catch a sheet. @ross Iโve been using a Dell 1350cnw which I got for free in a promotion when I bought a set of Toner in 2010. Itโs a rebranded Brother machine and itโs still going strong! (Aside from the fact that Dell never released drivers for 32 bit operating systems so I have to keep an old Mac running as a printer server!) @ross "Neither has fallen off the WiFi or insisted I sign up for an ink-related hostage situation or" ๐ @ross nice, it's not even an April 1st article. I have a Brother printer, it comes from a long line of Brothers my wife has owned. It annoys me that it won't scan to a USB stick and the document scanner isn't two sided, but otherwise it's good enough and cheap. |
@ross I have that exact printer and I can confirm it's the best.