@forgejo and dropping it will bring forgejo one step closer to be accepted into debian's main repo (currently forgejo does not satisfy dfsg)
@jing @forgejo Oh that's interesting to know, is there a page that lists these requirements? Or is there an already existing issue for Forgejo's inclusion?
@jing @forgejo wait... Where does having a client to a proprietary DB violate dfsg?
https://www.debian.org/social_contract
Gregory's Server
@jing @forgejo Oh that's interesting to know, is there a page that lists these requirements? Or is there an already existing issue for Forgejo's inclusion?