@bruce @timbray @lcamtuf @rfc6919 @projectgus oh, absolutely agreed on all that. furthermore, whether or not THIS attack was state-sponsored, now everybody has seen the strategy.
Top-level
@bruce @timbray @lcamtuf @rfc6919 @projectgus oh, absolutely agreed on all that. furthermore, whether or not THIS attack was state-sponsored, now everybody has seen the strategy. 4 comments
@bruce @irenes @timbray @lcamtuf @rfc6919 @projectgus @jannem @bruce @irenes @timbray @rfc6919 @projectgus This is an awful lot of effort to put into a "product" that has a non-trivial chance of getting burned on first try if your customer is careless. It's something you use when a really compelling need arises, and where you can control most of the variables to minimize the risk of loss. |
@irenes @timbray @lcamtuf @rfc6919 @projectgus
Yup. And to be clear, I don't necessarily think the US or UK in particular is behind this. I think it's more likely China, or perhaps Russia. The point is, we don't know. And like you implied, it could still turn out to have been an individual with an agenda.