@leeloo@Catvalente I mean, you're already failing to understand that logic didn't enter into any of it. You can't really argue with theofascists. There weren't facts; there were articles of faith, to which the facts would be fit or discarded as necessary.
Edit: That said, the primary goal was always reversing the acceptance of gay people. It was always about forcing adherence to our religious beliefs, by hook or by crook. Rhetoric around defending "turf" was mostly in service to that.
@leeloo @Catvalente I mean, you're already failing to understand that logic didn't enter into any of it. You can't really argue with theofascists. There weren't facts; there were articles of faith, to which the facts would be fit or discarded as necessary.
Edit: That said, the primary goal was always reversing the acceptance of gay people. It was always about forcing adherence to our religious beliefs, by hook or by crook. Rhetoric around defending "turf" was mostly in service to that.