Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Mike P

@hrefna Interesting! Thank you. Some things that stand out to me:

1 - This confirms what I already thought: humans can understand things, AIs can't.

2 - As an experienced programmer who knows no Rust at all, I found the human PR far more understandable, and I even felt that it _taught_ me a little about the language, as opposed to the AI PR which taught me nothing at all.

3 - WTF is with that "New method..." comment? If I was reviewing this, I'd say "hell no" to that.

3 comments
Hrefna (DHC)

@FenTiger yeah, 100% agreed. The "new method" comment stood out to me as well as an example of "this thing is bad at writing documentation by the standards of bad documentation"

Yvan DS 🗺️ :ferris: :go:

@hrefna @FenTiger what worries me even more, is that this is a "good case", with all the technics we have at the moment.
Everything that I have tested recently on all the LLMs out there showed me that all the answers on the same subject tend to converge, even on very different models.

I don't have data, but my theory is that they are all trained on more or less the same datasets. So their answers and capabilities converge.

It's going to look like this. Inadequate in non simple cases.

@hrefna @FenTiger what worries me even more, is that this is a "good case", with all the technics we have at the moment.
Everything that I have tested recently on all the LLMs out there showed me that all the answers on the same subject tend to converge, even on very different models.

I don't have data, but my theory is that they are all trained on more or less the same datasets. So their answers and capabilities converge.

Yvan DS 🗺️ :ferris: :go:

@hrefna @FenTiger the style might be different.
But the intent seems to be the same everywhere.

Go Up