@polotek I largely agree with you (and some of the yelling is pretty appalling, especially where it ignores how the bridge functions).
That said, I think the bridge can offer better UX if it 'knocks', since it can then reasonably choose to bridge Unlisted/'Quiet Public' posts over to the often-algorithmic Bsky feeds to make them available to followers there, rather than just "loud" Public ones plus some mentions.
There are some minor protocol mismatches like that, as well as the general difference in how moderation is expected to work (there are built-in shared blocklists there now, which I'd definitely like as an option here), that imo make opt-in requests the smoother experience overall.
@Qazm
if it knocks?
so let me get this straight in my head, and forgive me if I have the wrong end of the stick...
every time someone over in Jack's most recent scam wants to "follow" me from there, i should get a message asking if its okay?
i haven't consented to anyone over there knowing anything about me, but they clearly are going to have some way to discover my existence. where's the consent-basis here?
if someone from "over there" decides to QT me, will i then get a stack of additional requests from all of their followers to allow them to see the QT? again, where's the consent-basis for that?
in what way is any of that justifiable?
@polotek
@Qazm
if it knocks?
so let me get this straight in my head, and forgive me if I have the wrong end of the stick...
every time someone over in Jack's most recent scam wants to "follow" me from there, i should get a message asking if its okay?
i haven't consented to anyone over there knowing anything about me, but they clearly are going to have some way to discover my existence. where's the consent-basis here?