Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
SelfsameSynonym

@Gargron lol you pushed *back* against the kind of whitelisting that authenticated fetch allows.

https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/issues/3880

And with Purism, you removed the moderation code for their fork, then acted shocked and appalled that they weren’t going to moderate and then even more shocked when they advertised it to the nazis on Gab

And with Samsung, it’s nice to see you’re willing to admit that counter to your meme, Mastodon has revenue streams

No comments
SelfsameSynonym

@Gargron I also think it’s pretty telling how I never mentioned Purism by name but you immediately thought of them when I called them the Nazis you worked for

Eugen Rochko

@selfsamesynonym 1. I was and still am against whitelisting as a default federation model. I have since added a whitelist mode for academic uses which I respect. Authenticated fetch wasn't even a concept at the time those discussions were happening and is unrelated to whitelisting.

2. I never acted shocked and apalled about what Purism was doing. You must be confusing me with someone else. How they run their server is their business. This also predates Gab appearing on the fediverse.

Go Up