Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Ténno Seremélʹ

@drq
> And ZIP is just literally the Windows 98 way.

Which is still infinitely better than flatpak :blobcatcoffee:

9 comments
Dr. Quadragon ❌

@tennoseremel I don't care.

And I don't care how "good" or "bad" flatpaks are. This is just irrelevant.

From a developer's standpoint, all I care about is "decide on **something** already, you ADHD-riddled scatterbrained fucks!"

Ténno Seremélʹ

@drq I don't understand your complain. ZIP is something :blobcatgooglyshrug:

Ténno Seremélʹ replied to Dr. Quadragon ❌

@drq How about you go there instead :blobcatcoffee:

Dr. Quadragon ❌ replied to Ténno

@tennoseremel I'm not into manual software management.

Ténno Seremélʹ replied to Dr. Quadragon ❌

@drq You are into overengineered solutions, thô.

Dr. Quadragon ❌ replied to Ténno

@tennoseremel I'm into practicality.

Having no standards is not practical.

As for overengineered - well, we brought this onto ourselves - by having no standards, ironically. The distros won't ever agree on the structure of the OS? Well, if you can't bring a mountain to a man, you have to bring a man to a mountain.

If you want to bring order into a disordered system, you have to engineer for every contigency.

The plan is to run on every distro. How do you cover every distro?

So this is actually the least overengineered solution, it could be way, WAY worse.

@tennoseremel I'm into practicality.

Having no standards is not practical.

As for overengineered - well, we brought this onto ourselves - by having no standards, ironically. The distros won't ever agree on the structure of the OS? Well, if you can't bring a mountain to a man, you have to bring a man to a mountain.

Go Up