Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
aburtch

This is what happens when you pay people for the work they do. (Via @Radical_EgoCom)

36 comments
FinalOverdrive

@aburtch @Radical_EgoCom And this a small business. Small businesses can be union compliant.

Leon B. 💯

@FinalOverdrive @aburtch @Radical_EgoCom@kolektiva.social ...and they can grow as well into a business that can rival the big ones. Hopefully they will be able to stay union compliant.

CaveTroll DemJen TrueFatFuck

@aburtch @Radical_EgoCom hell yeah, they make fantastic films too. Good for them.

Veronica ⚧ 🏳️‍⚧️

@aburtch @Radical_EgoCom
Small independent studios are able AND willing to meet union demands.
How is this "unrealistic" or "unreasonable"?

What IS unreasonable?
Paying a CEO $27M per year, THAT is unreasonable.

maxine

@aburtch
there's gonna be so many good and also really bad A24 films coming up. I hope they greenlight everything

@Radical_EgoCom

Clinton Anderson SwordForHire

@aburtch @Radical_EgoCom To meet all the financial demands of the WAG/SAG-AFTRA strike would cost a paltry 420 million.... The colossal flops that were The Flash, and Dial Of Destiny cost waaaaaay more than that combined.

There is no end of existing money to meet these demands.

#StayStrong
#Solidarity

TheGameMole

@aburtch @Radical_EgoCom A24 just continues to be the coolest people in the film industry.

kierkegaank

@aburtch @Radical_EgoCom A24 also make the best movies since like a decade ago

Bowreality

@aburtch @radical_egocom@kolektiva.social Sweet. Let’s look them up and start watching all their movies now.

aburtch

@bowreality Yes. And almost all of their output is stellar.

Bowreality

@aburtch Cool! Off I go and find some of their movies

Cal Alaera

@aburtch @robinsyl As I understand it, the interesting thing about this is that the agreement doesn't even specify exactly what the terms are. It's an agreement that, whatever the new industry norm is, A24 will (retroactively) match or beat it. The big studios still need to sit down with the unions and figure out what those terms will be.

aburtch

@Cal @robinsyl True. But A24 is still saying whatever the final deal, we agree with all union points and will pay.

Meanwhile Disney, Netflix and others whose profits run into the billions and who both pay their CEO more than all the union demands combined, claim poverty and refuse to pay.

Flekk Dog

@aburtch @Radical_EgoCom I wouldn't say A24 is small budget but the point stands

Rachel Greenham

@aburtch @Radical_EgoCom @lisamelton at a glance of the thumbnail i thought this was going to be about logo design.

Fifi Lamoura

@aburtch @Radical_EgoCom A24 is an amazing production house that supports original artistic visions and artists, this doesn't surprise me at all. It's been awesome watching them succeed by betting on creativity and supporting diversity.

DELETED

@aburtch @Radical_EgoCom@kolektiva.social oh my idea of a a24 tattoo just got better

Tom Farmer

@aburtch @Radical_EgoCom It does not have to be a fight to the death or a mutual suicide pact (corporate media vs. the creative class). As soon as we can agree on dignity and fairness as mutual priorities, we’ll be getting somewhere. But writers and artists are not going to be ranched like veal.

aburtch

@BrickDuck @Radical_EgoCom I agree with your sentiment, but we’ll never get there because corporations aren’t people. They have no moral compass, no compassion, nothing. Their only purpose is profit and they are punished by shareholders if they don’t go to extreme lengths in pursuit of it.

Dignity and fairness are not priorities for corporations, only profit.

For example, Netflix paid their CEO more money last year than the writers are requesting over the course of their entire contract.

Kofi Loves Efia

@aburtch @BrickDuck @Radical_EgoCom the history of the belief that corporations exist only to make a profit is fascinating and relatively new. It's not codified in law, charter or history. It's a fairly radical rewrite of history, and ignores virtually all of the last 300 years of practice.

nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2015

Biggles

@Seruko @aburtch @BrickDuck @Radical_EgoCom correct.
Milton Friedman has a lot to answer for with the wholesale adoption of the Friedman Doctrine by the financial sector (which then trickled into everything they financed)

"so we don't have to give a shit about social and environmental impacts as long as shareholders make bank?? Sign us up!"

aburtch

@Seruko @BrickDuck @Radical_EgoCom Sure, there are B Corps and sole proprietorships who care about their employees. And it may not have always been that way.

But the reality we live in today is that CEOs have more money than they can spend in 1,000 years while teachers have to work multiple jobs to get by. And it’s not changing unless someone makes them. So far no one can or has.

DELETED

@aburtch @BrickDuck @Radical_EgoCom

The companies in question are all about profit and pretty much, only profit. It's been clear as long as they have been around.

I don't understand someone defending a company that has such unbelievable inequity in pay. Or defending companies that use people and their art without just compensation

:blahaj: Why Not Zoidberg? 🦑

@aburtch @BrickDuck @Radical_EgoCom exactly. A corporation has only one purpose: to give the stock holders profit. It's literally the only thing they exist to do.

Go Up