Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Lesley Carhart :unverified:

Ad blockers are also cybersecurity. Say it with me.

They reduce malvertising, watering hole attacks, and general malicious script execution. It’s not all about you, ad firms.

32 comments
Vern McCandlish

@hacks4pancakes
I agree. I will pay for the services I use (I even pay for ad blocker plus) and keep my ad-blockers on. Including a DNS sinkhole version.

Vern McCandlish

@hacks4pancakes
Oops I didn't follow instructions. "Ad blockers are also cybersecurity."

Lesley Carhart :unverified:

@0x58 probably my time wasting on YouTube if they implement this….

Robert Hollingshead :donor:

@hacks4pancakes and since Google is *THE* ad firm this wrecks all their credibility in the security space.

Lesley Carhart :unverified:

@0xF21D Google has a fabulous security team who likely have next to no influence on this madness.

An Obscure Tenet

@miah @hacks4pancakes @0xF21D Any hint of that and Google just fires literally everyone and hires from the never-ending stream of bootlicking techbros desperate to add FAAAAAAAAAANG to their resume.

Good people leave, shitheads reign supreme. It's like stack ranking yourself.

Robert Hollingshead :donor:

@hacks4pancakes Agree 100%. It just sucks they're under the same huge roof.

Bryce

@hacks4pancakes ya, but it kind of is about the ad firms.

"It's not you, it's me." -infosec

Lesley Carhart :unverified:

@NationMeta it’s not all about a personal attack on then, I should phrase it.

synlogic

@hacks4pancakes yeah I've been doing some ad engine design thinking lately. and its an interesting challenge trying to balance both ad/lead effectiveness with honoring user privacy/anonymity. inherently they tend to pull in *opposite* directions. though I know of ways to "square the circle", haha

Alan

@hacks4pancakes maybe if the SOBs would conduct some oversight of their customers, we wouldn't feel compelled to filter them out.

Tindra

@hacks4pancakes I’d happily return to classic, static, lovingly hand-placed on each page by the admin, banner ads.

Those were at least usually relevant to my interests!

DELETED

@hacks4pancakes I'm a big fan of DNS filtering for this, but it can be a challenge for people who aren't comfortable running their own servers. Thoughts on AdGuard's free, public DNS? There is still a barrier for normal people in their private lives, but it's at least lower.

adguard-dns.io/en/public-dns.h

Boba Yaga

@hacks4pancakes I use Privacy Badger, which isn't an adblocker, but that doesn't stop websites from constantly telling me to turn off my adblocker.

Kris Mitka :java: :rust:

@hacks4pancakes great point! Ad blockers might be why attacks using ads aren’t more prolific.

dro

@hacks4pancakes counter-surveillance. we need more of it.

immibis
@revolt3d @hacks4pancakes are you saying we should break into advertising executives' houses and plant wiretaps? would be fun, but I don't think it's legal
D C Ross

@hacks4pancakes
I don't use ad blockers because I don't like advertising companies, I do it because I don't have any reason to trust them.

Suppose that you had a friend who claimed that they were a completely self-taught driver, had no driver's license and had still managed to be behind the wheel for several spectacular accidents within the last month. And suppose that they asked to borrow your car.

50gp

@hacks4pancakes its quite concerning how little online advertisers care about what content they are pushing

there are so many ads that are fake, malicious or otherwise not legal and apparently its not the companies job to police them before publishing?

Doug Warren

@hacks4pancakes
To be fair, unblocked ads do tend to secure a web browser, by soaking up so much bandwidth that nothing else, malicious or otherwise, can get through.

Go Up