Rust: The wrong people are resigning
https://gist.github.com/fasterthanlime/42da9378768aebef662dd26dddf04849
Rust: The wrong people are resigning https://gist.github.com/fasterthanlime/42da9378768aebef662dd26dddf04849 11 comments
@lambda @fasterthanlime all (the (good people (who could've left))) haven't yet i.e., the people, who are good, and who could have left—these people have not left. @fasterthanlime thank you for writing this. how many times do we have to be in the in group to learn that oh yea there are good people with good intentions but shit for execution. More clarity on what you mean by "out group"? > Part of me is very disappointed at ThePrimeagen Now that you mention it, big oof, very true. I couldn't put my finger on why I lost interest in watching, I guess this is it. As for crablang, I do feel as though it serves a purpose in these tumultuous times. Put simply: it keeps rustlang honest (or at least should have, these events bring that into question). @jcdickinson anyone who isn’t part of any of these private chats, either semi official ones (mostly on Discord), official ones (mostly on Zulip, or in-person / one-to-one), is part of the out group. I believe those private spaces have NOT worked out, to say the least. @fasterthanlime This seems like a good step towards abolishing there being an "in group" at all. |
@fasterthanlime
thanks for the insight and much-needed optimism (limited as it may be).
n.b.: english grammar is complicated, how should the quantifiers in "all the good people who could’ve left haven’t yet" be interpreted?