@grishka so peertube supports groups? Im surprised by that. Also, have you ever tried to federate with lemmy? We have open test instances at https://enterprise.lemmy.ml
Top-level
@grishka so peertube supports groups? Im surprised by that. Also, have you ever tried to federate with lemmy? We have open test instances at https://enterprise.lemmy.ml 15 comments
@felix well, I send the one suggested by the spec: The spec also says that you're supposed to support application/activity+json. Mastodon actually sends both, comma-separated. I see that FEDERATION.md is not updated yet.. are you planning to? It's far from a perfect mechanism, but can still be a timesaver when ppl are figuring things out. For #lemmy it'd also be nice to have this. A couple of examples are shown in the #ActivityPub implementers guide on #socialhub See: https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/guide-for-new-activitypub-implementers/479#federation-md (You can edit yourself, as this is a wiki post). cc @activitypub @humanetech @felix yeah I will update it at some point. With both this and the wall stuff, I changed it since to follow that FEP of mine. @grishka the truth is that we dont really know how the context works, or what it should look like. but its easy to fix because its just a hardcoded string. would you like to make an issue or a PR? https://yerbamate.ml/LemmyNet/lemmy/src/branch/main/crates/apub/src/extensions/context.rs |
@felix PeerTube represents its channels as Group actors.
I tried poking into Lemmy maybe a month ago last time, and I couldn't get it to return ActivityPub objects. IIRC it didn't parse the Accept header correctly, and thus could only federate with itself. Haven't checked if that's been fixed since.