|
Top-level
 The only objects that can't be referenced through that /objects collection are the ones that are not addressed to either the shared inbox of the server, or the ActivityPub public namespace. (ie, objects generated by private Activities - addressed only to specific actors' inboxes) I'm still not 100% sure this is the way I want to keep things, but for now it serves me well, and lowers the complexity of managing objects' IRIs. 2 comments
@grishka so, I think that answers your question of where it goes: nowhere. The object remains, only the reference to it in the collection is removed. :D Delete on an IRI transforms the object it refers to into a Tombstone, it does not remove it. That's why I think a Remove is needed for removing it from a collection. Anyway, I think I'll stop pestering you with my feedback, mastodon is not the proper place for it. :D If I ever get the time, I'll try to send you a better detailed document. |
Gregory's Server
@mariusor they do have unique URIs, but when they aren't in any collection, nothing links to them from anywhere, so they're kinda just floating there in the ether. Knowing that URI becomes the only way to discover them.