Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Top-level
Cat Hicks

I don't know what you are all here sharing thoughts online FOR, but my assumption is that we are in general trying to use some of the same social mechanisms that we rely on for like.......social life in general

18 comments
Cat Hicks

If you launched a reply with a misconception say "sorry"! If you ask me to teach you something say "thank you"! If someone has opened up to share an emotion say "that must be hard"!

We're in a relationship if we're talking. A ridiculous, fleeting, tiny relationship, but still. I look at every replier I don't know to see if they follow me -- that's cog effort too! I am way colder to the people who don't follow me because I assume we have no reciprocity! Would you text me like this?

Cat Hicks

God I get outgrouped so hard on mastodon it just cracks me up. It's honestly not to the level of trolling which is why standard social media language doesn't fit well to describe my personal experiences here. But it's OUTGROUPING and that's real. It's so funny when I respond with just as much cold bluntness as someone replied to me with and suddenly it's like "my god how dare"

Cat Hicks

But, many people ingroup and those are the folks who stick around following this shouty version of me 🤗 I see you! idk y'all, I just like conversations and don't like being an object. Many of us are like this I think.

berserk du soleil

@grimalkina I think so much about the socializing afflictions people show on here and am still not sure how to describe them. Like truly people are not ever learning or using social cues, boundaries, and other very basic childhood era social consents. It's worrying!!

Cat Hicks

@aetataureate thank you for affirming this! I interpret it as a kind of contemptuous dismissal of those kinds of cues (which matter a lot to me given that I often study their impact) which is just mind-boggling to me. Sometimes for sure there are obvious innocent mistakes (I make them too, we all have perception filters sometimes) but I was thinking about when people seem to fully fail to correct or dispute the impact of these behaviors on the receiver

Bynkii (they/them)

@grimalkina the fedi has a huge component of people utterly convinced of their own right-ness, that when you’re “correct”, manners and tone don’t matter, and at the same time, more able to be appalled at the slightest pushback than a stereotypical Victorian spinster.

They are just ridiculous.

MycotropicForHarris

@grimalkina

It feels like fairly slow oral communication to me! Really all that's missing is picking up the tab or buying the next round.

I've promised myself to think about datenight today and not dwell only on the failure of our republic today, I hope that you can do something similar!

Cat Hicks

@mycotropic gosh so much of the time I am like, "this is a conversation for drinks not this post" :). I am doing some nice things thank you!! Writing a paper I am really loving today

MycotropicForHarris

@grimalkina

Quantitative psych you say, I'm quantitative biological epidemiology but I wish I were a lot better at qualitative work. Yesterday we talked about #AdrinalInsufficiency assessment for a grant my friend is putting in like now. We're thinking about doing a grant to look at avoiding misdiagnosis/delayed diagnosis of those conditions but most of the conversation with the patient advocacy group was "will there be a ln NIH next year?" Hence my comment in the last post.

What's the general topic of your manuscript? Do you write alone or with collaborators? My work is almost exclusively based on collaboration, I've never published a single author paper for instance

@grimalkina

Quantitative psych you say, I'm quantitative biological epidemiology but I wish I were a lot better at qualitative work. Yesterday we talked about #AdrinalInsufficiency assessment for a grant my friend is putting in like now. We're thinking about doing a grant to look at avoiding misdiagnosis/delayed diagnosis of those conditions but most of the conversation with the patient advocacy group was "will there be a ln NIH next year?" Hence my comment in the last post.

Alex M. Dunne :ally:

@grimalkina

I'm here to find, follow, and learn from those unlike me.

And to boost others, promote facts and equality, and ❤ photos of kids & dogs.

Cat Hicks

@alex nicely described in your social context bio too :)

bmaxv

@grimalkina I read the rest too, but I want to reply to this specifically. I'm not sure that's true.

I'm not sure that that kind of social life "naturally exists" for everyone or that they learned the mechanism.

Besides the way you're writing and other self presentation is already broadcasting some image implicitly. E.g. if someone displays personal beliefs with clothing, do you care why they hold those beliefs? Or do you just recognize, deal with it and move on?

Made me think though.

Cat Hicks

@bmaxv I'm not sure I'm following. Your second point seems to affirm the existence of social and communicative information.

But your first -- you think we exist in some kind of inchoate madness where we have no cognitive and psychological apparatus that gives us social mechanisms of communication? The fact that you and I are speaking in mutually understandable sentences belies that. If you think that we are just so far apart in our mental models of how humans work we probably won't agree

bmaxv

@grimalkina There is certainly an intersection of beliefs and methods of communication, otherwise it wouldn't work.

But I'm not sure the connection between "someone is saying something online" and "it is *necessary* to learn more about that person and why they are saying it" is as strict and strong.

Even if we don't agree, I wanted to sort... throw a point in there, that that assumption ("supposed to exert...") may not always be true.

To help refine that mental model I guess?

Cat Hicks

@bmaxv I think I'm following. I suppose when I say "some of the same social mechanisms", to me this modifies the statement enough that it's not saying ONLINE IS EXACTLY REAL LIFE CONVO! THE SAME! I would never walk up to you on the street and have this convo. I also would leave this comment hanging and go get food with no guilt. Different rules that way!

But my example is more like: a thank you online still has a social impact on the hearer. A blunt query still carries information.

Go Up