@diffractie @jackbrewster killjoys ;)

@diffractie "Great old ones"? Weird way to say "big unnaturals", but ok.

@diffractie put pictures of big natural bodybuilders as an example for extra clarity

@diffractie whoever said math can't be fun is a liar

@diffractie Oh, gosh, don't I know it, for some reason they want "high dimensionality" instead of "big D"

@diffractie hefty wholes

@diffractie Perhaps: they are just trying to make a couple of points and
just end up making bigger boobs with their calculations and roundings up? 🤗

@diffractie only fns

@diffractie ok I giggled

Sufficiently large positive integers. Please. Always specify the sufficiently.

@diffractie screw this, I'm gonna study group theory (the group: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tits_group)

@diffractie I'll try to search for “large positive integers” on the porn site next door :-)

@diffractie That big int energy

@diffractie And yet this exists:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexy_prime

@diffractie killjoys

@diffractie those nerds are doing nothing to fight against the stereotype of being sexless virgins

@diffractie
Organic that seems. And organic is always good.

@diffractie This just showed up in a Discord I'm in, and I'm trying to imagine how it got there.

edit: oh. from my perspective it only has 8 boosts >_>

@diffractie Tirritate them by speaking lengthily of "integral numbers".

@diffractie The Tits cone is constructed from the Coxeter Groups.

https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/657109/the-tits-cone-geometric-understanding

@diffractie overachievers.

@diffractie They're wrong, as they're literally synonoums xD

@diffractie
@BernieDoesIt

Theorem: There exist no boring naturals.

@diffractie
You are a blessing to us all. ^_^

@diffractie say “big naturals”

-a mathematician

@diffractie Gandalf Large Positive Intergers

@diffractie nice vertices.

@diffractie 🤣