Email or username:

Password:

Forgot your password?
Darius Kazemi

Okay Fediverse, here's your time to shine. I am provisioning a new dev laptop and can pick whatever Debian-flavored Linux distro I want. I'm eyeing Mint because I had a good experience with it 10 years ago and I hate snap.

Any other recommendations for interesting distros? I have been mostly-Ubuntu for a decade, in part because it was required by my workplace.

27 comments
brennen

@darius in some ways i use it for reasons of being almost anti-interesting, but i always feel kind of obligated to plug the "debian stable is actually a pretty great desktop" POV, having pretty well migrated everything back to it after some years of ubuntu on laptops.

Darius Kazemi

@brennen plain-Debian was my first linux distro back in 2001, it would be an interesting trip down memory lane

past oral no mad

@darius @brennen I agree here, I still run plain Debian on most stuff and find it a very reasonable Linux. I have been running it continuously since around 1997.

It's easier than ever since they finally allowed firmware blobs on the default install media in Debian 12, so you don't have to go hunting down a special unofficial installer for the WiFi to work.

brennen

@darius there are caveats, as with anything - some stuff is pretty stale on stable (i know a lot of people run testing or unstable instead for this reason), some stuff needs to be grabbed from outside the main apt sources or installed/built from whatever lang-specific package manager - but it's really predictable, i know everything super well, and i find the slow update cycle a good way to manage the rate of change.

Brian Boucheron

@darius @brennen i’ve reverted to plain debian w/ XFCE after being grossed out by ubuntu snaps and other nonsense. no complaints.

bg

@darius I just started with Pop-Os after using Ubuntu for many years. So far very happy. No snaps, I can define the path of my thunderbird profile folder and so forth ... but still similar enough to not be confused with to many new things.

JP

@darius my laptop still runs @elementary, though i haven't upgraded it in many years (no in-place upgrades). even that older version of their DE is quite pleasant and their general UX focus is commendable!

Anand Philip

@darius i've been using pop os for the last three years because I game+dev, works well outof the box.

Jan Lehnardt :couchdb:

@darius would avoid Ubuntu on account of snaps, rest is up to you.

DELETED

@darius Debian stable is pretty good. With emphasis in ✨️stable✨️!

mcc

@darius Based on my experiences using Ubuntu over the last eight months I'd say probably not Ubuntu. But I think you made that conclusion already lol

But if you go with Ubuntu or an Ubuntu derivative target 22.04 LTS *not* 24.04 for now, the 23.10-24.04 range is currently a mess

cslinuxboy

@darius Mint's a good choice. I personally like #EndeavourOS since it has all the pros of #Arch without the convoluted setup process. The only gripe I've had with Mint is its desktop env. being buggy with lower-end graphics cards. I love EndeavourOS since I never have to add a PPA for extra packages.

Matt Gaughan

@darius was in a similar situation a few months ago. landed on Debian stable, no regrets at all so far.

Terence Eden

@darius
I like Pop_OS. Works well for me. Excellent Wayland support. No Snaps unless you want them.

Chance N. Counter

@darius I won’t evangelize for one in particular, but it’s always worth noting (once) that I too was Debian-based until Something Happened that put me on a different distro family.

I now run Debian-based systems on everything *except* my dev rigs, which can enjoy newer software than Mint offers, and much newer than Debian-stable.

I thought the stability Debian offered was the main thing, but with a snapshot-based FS, the main thing is access to current releases, and I’m a happier programmer.

Esther Alter

@darius Debian. It got much easier to install third party drivers.

For desktop environment:

KDE: You want to look at a pretty DE
Gnome: you want to be frustrated
Cinnamon: you want gnome
MATE: idk why you'd choose this
XFCE: You want a DE to be boring and functional*
LXQt: you have an old computer
Custom setup with a lightweight WM: you want to think about Linux instead of gender*

* My preferred options

@darius Debian. It got much easier to install third party drivers.

For desktop environment:

KDE: You want to look at a pretty DE
Gnome: you want to be frustrated
Cinnamon: you want gnome
MATE: idk why you'd choose this
XFCE: You want a DE to be boring and functional*
LXQt: you have an old computer
Custom setup with a lightweight WM: you want to think about Linux instead of gender*

Darius Kazemi

@esther_alter haha I used to be an Xfce guy and will likely go back

Francesco P Lovergine

@darius Simply plain Debian stable with flatpak for selected applications or even some container based solutions for other stuff, e.g. apptainer or docker just in case. It is more than enough for any practical use.

Ulrich Popp :jf:

@darius I am using Debian since 2000. Before I had SuSE. I use Debian stable. Over years with XFCE, which also runs well on older machines.

Ben Zanin

@darius don't pick plain old Debian! It's boring and reliable and well vetted, and 12 / Bookworm has been particularly solid, so it won't be interesting at all.

GeoWend

@darius I have been happy with MX linux...do take into account that I am not a dev of any sort, and just wanted something that worked fine for me.

Clive Thompson

@darius

try mint and report back, I’ve been interested to hear what it’s like!

Adrian

@darius As Debian and Mint are mentioned a lot, you might go with LMDE, the Linux Mint Debian version. I switched to it from regular mint on my new work laptop and have been fine until now.

Go Up