Note: I don't mind Snap. I'd rather my OS be using Flatpak, but I mostly use Snap on purpose and I don't specifically object to my applications being installed as Snap. I just want Snap/Flatpak to like… work right.
Top-level
Note: I don't mind Snap. I'd rather my OS be using Flatpak, but I mostly use Snap on purpose and I don't specifically object to my applications being installed as Snap. I just want Snap/Flatpak to like… work right. 16 comments
@mcc I agree that as an end user you shouldn't have to care about the philosophy of native v/s namespace v/s whatever snap does, you should just be able to trust the OS default to JustWork(tm). but this is kind of why I have been against this whole snap and flatpak business. I trust my distro, and by extension, the native packages the maintainers have put in the repos to work well in concert with each other. @double_a_runi Well, my experience is that the distro maintainers are very, very conservative and always have very old versions of things, and that Homebrew is very high quality and always has new versions of things, so I'm in principle interested in a software distribution system that looks more like Homebrew than apt @mcc wait we have brew on Linux? anyway yeah, you are describing why I slowly moved from ubuntu -> mint -> arch . ubuntu got annoying, and mint packages were always old. I know arch is a meme, but its been working for me, and I will move to something else when it stops working for me? @double_a_runi I was using OS X locally and linux only on servers until quite recently! Then I rapidly abandoned Mac for Windows and then rapidly abandoned Windows for Linux. But also, yeah, you can use Homebrew on Linux, if you're feeling adventurous… https://docs.brew.sh/Homebrew-on-Linux @mcc curl to bash to install, looks promising. sorry I have nothing useful to reply, I've used brew to install lima on macos, so I can have linux in there, but not beyond that. I don't know how it works, and what kind of conflicts it can have. @mcc if you prefer newer versions, you may want to try Arch (or Endeavour OS, which is basically Arch, but with a more user-friendly installation process, and even more shiny new things). In the last couple of years, I barely did any maintenance to make it work for me, and I'm on Wayland and all. Also, in my experience, KDE is much more sensible than Gnome. I love it. It's still nice even when compared to OS X, and a lot better than Windows 11. @RAOF Or create problems for users that they otherwise wouldn't have, like no longer being able to upload files from where they happen to be stored. @mcc I try not to use snap because got tired of path and config issues, and that there's no easy way to remove cache or old installs, it can quickly fill a drive. My experience with Linux desktop is similar to windows nowadays in terms of time invested in removing bloat and configure tools, and cursing the system due to crashes (I don't have access to freshly new hardware so whatever I get has some years of testing and fixes on top) @mcc This has been my experience, too, with moving back to Linux as a daily driver after a decade away. So many things that either have not improved or have gotten noticeably worse, it's truly boggling. If I were less experienced with diagnosing and addressing these things, it would be a complete non starter. |
@mcc > I just want Snap/Flatpak to like… work right.
That would be a huge improvement in my experience.