ai | josh

@mcc i feel like we need llm opt out considerations in foss licenses tbh, then host code off github and nothing changes? Hard to enforce idk unlikely politicians will get it right, maybe the ftc will get lucky?

Like 3 April at 20:42 | Wall-to-wall | Open on wetdry.world

3 comments

mcc

@josh I don't like this because (1) it means GPL2 is dead, and (2) it feels like admitting that an AI opt-out is something we specifically needed. Meanwhile, machine transformation of my work is something I generally want, I just want the license to be observed.

3 April at 20:43 | Open on mastodon.social

josh

@mcc yeah plus if the opt out for the stack stands it means they got everything in the past at least once so anyone with every version of it can combine them to get all the old stuff anyways. I HOPE that someone can get lucky and stop companies from shittifying everything, but it does kinda feel like this is the break in case of emergency that the clause in the gpl about adhering to future versions was made for

3 April at 20:48 | Open on wetdry.world

clacke: looking for something 🇸🇪🇭🇰💙💛

@josh @mcc Either copyright doesn't apply and then whatever you put in your license doesn't matter, or copyright does apply and then the existing copyleft licenses are enough.

3 April at 20:47 | Open on libranet.de

Go Up